Allowed
Rajeev Dhingra v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/10346/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner approached the High Court for bail. The learned counsel for the respondent State informed the court that the petitioner has complied with the earlier order to join the investigation and is not needed for custodial interrogation. The court allowed the petition by making the interim bail absolute under Section 438(2) CrPC without expressing an opinion on merits.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed; order dated 1.4.2013 made absolute; interim bail confirmed subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.