Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR under Section 306 IPC based on a compromise. Upon pointing to the Supreme Court judgment in Gian Singh, counsel sought withdrawal, leading to dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-10214 of 2013 Date of Decision: April 01, 2013
Deepak Kumar
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Siao, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral)
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.44 dated 14.02.2013, under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Gobindgarh Mandi, District Fatehgarh Sahib and subsequent proceedings arising from it, on the basis of compromise 06.03.2013 (Annexure P/2) and affidavit dated 06.03.2013 (Annexure P/4).
On being confronted with the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
April 01, 2013 [Paramjeet Singh] vkd Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh vs. State of PunjabReferred¶12
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Kumar
State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
