The petitioner, who joined the investigation pursuant to an interim order, was granted anticipatory bail. The earlier interim order dated 26.03.2013 was made absolute without passing comments on the merits.
Instant petition for anticipatory bail allowed; interim order dated 26.03.2013 made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-10041 OF 2013 DATE OF DECISION : 22nd MAY, 2013
Ved Parkash
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. R. N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the complainant.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ashok Kumar, stated that petitioner has since joined investigation pursuant to interim order of this Court.
In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything on merits of the case, instant petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. Interim order dated 26.03.2013 is made absolute.
22nd May, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Ved Parkash
State of Haryana
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
