Single judge dismissed a civil revision petition challenging a Rent Controller's direction for rent deposit. Held that the revision ought to be dismissed as filed due to lack of necessary adjudication and that the direction did not prejudice the petitioners.
Civil revision petition dismissed as filed without any need.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR No.8081 of 2011(O&M)
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.8081 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 06.02.2013
Harish Chand and others
... Petitioners
Versus
Anil Kumar son of Shri Jai Kishan, Sol Proprietor, M/s Aggarwal Departmental Store, Shop No.211, Ward No.9, Main Bazar, Faridabad Old, resident of House No.1764, Sector 16, Faridabad.
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
CR No.8081 of 2011(O&M)
[2]
has been filed by the present petitioners against the judgment of the district Court, which has found the respondent to be a tenant. As of date, so long as the decree is not in any way suspended, the respondent's status as a tenant is an adjudicated issue. It may be subject to a change or alteration in second appeal but a direction for deposit made by the Rent Controller in no way could prejudice the petitioners.
CR No.8081 of 2011(O&M)
[3]
6th February, 2013 Rajan
( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision against a direction to deposit rent by the respondent is maintainable when the tenant status is under trial.
Whether the present civil revision ought to be dismissed as filed without any need due to lack of adjudication.
Whether a direction for deposit by a claimant of tenant status prejudices the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harish Chand and others
Anil Kumar
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
