observing that same was filed after five months of the order. This apart application for re-calling said order was not maintainable. It appears, thereafter order dated 23.2.2012 was challenged by petitioners by way of Civil Revision No.540 of 2013. Revision petition was, however, dismissed as withdrawn on request of the counsel with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. Hence, instant petition. A query has been put to counsel for the petitioners whether application for recalling order dated 23.2.2012 was maintainable before the trial court. He submits that there was no other remedy available with the petitioners. I am not convinced with this argument. It is evident that at the time order dated 23.2.2012 was passed striking off the defence of the petitioners, their counsel was present. The petitioner corporation, however, chose not to challenge the said order by way of appeal/revision. Instead they moved an application for recalling it. Said application has been dismissed. I find no legal infirmity with the order. Revision petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed.