The Court held a revision against an order dismissing a petition to set aside an ex parte decree not maintainable, directing the petitioner to file an appeal instead and potentially seek exclusion of time.
Civil revision dismissed with liberty to file appeal and seek exclusion of time taken in bona fide prosecution of the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7035 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:11.01.2013
Harwinder Singh son of Shri Dalip Singh
...Petitioner
versus
Leelu Ram son of Hans Raj
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: Mr.Navdeep Monga, Advocate, for the petitioner.
K.Kannan, J. (Oral)
(K.KANNAN) JUDGE
11.01.2013 sanjeev
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision against an order dismissing a petition for setting aside an ex parte decree is maintainable.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Harwinder Singh
Leelu Ram
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
