Privilege case allowing revision regarding rejection of financier impleadment. Court held financier should be impleaded to adjudicate liability for accident claim. Order set aside.
Impugned order set aside; financier directed to be impleaded as respondent No.16.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rajan Kumar 2013.07.23 13:51 I am the author of this[1] document Chandigarh
CR No.4268 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.4268 of 2012 Date of Decision: 18.07.2013
Randhir Singh son of Raj son of Sh. Parbhu Dayal, resident of village Riwara, Tehsil Gohana and District Sonipat.
... Petitioner
Versus
Rajbala widow of Kishan Lal son of Ranjeet, resident of village Ranila, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District Bhiwani and others.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. Ramender Chauhan, Advocate
for the petitioner.
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
CR No.4268 of 2012
[2]
borne only by the financier, the Court ought to have impleaded the financier and made the adjudication in its presence. The application was perfectly justified and the dismissal of the application is erroneous.
( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE
18th July, 2013 Rajan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in refusing to implead the financier who had paid the insurance premium and assumed liability for the accident vehicle.
Randhir Singh
Rajbala and others
Punjab National Bank
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
