High Court dismissed three civil revisions by default of appearance and non-prosecution due to the absence of petitioners' counsel at the hearing.
Dismissal of civil revisions due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.3775 of 2000 Date of Decision.04.02.2013
2. C.R. No.3776 of 2000
Waryam Singh son of Sh. Dalip Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
Mangal Ram and others
.......Respondents
3. C.R. No.3322 of 1999
Mangal Ram and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Ancho Devi widow of Byan Singh and others.......Respondents
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Yadav, Advocate for the respondents in C.R. No.3322 of 1999.
None for the respondents in C.R. Nos.3775 & 3776 of 2000.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
appearance and non-prosecution.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
February 04, 2013 Pankaj*
Waryam Singh
Mangal Ram and others
Mangal Ram and others
Smt. Ancho Devi
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
