The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Civil Revision No. 3325 of 2013 as infructuous because the parties settled and the underlying suit was decreed. No legal propositions were laid down.
Disposition of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 3325 of 2013 Date of decision : September 16, 2013
Sarabjit Singh and another
....Petitioners
versus
Ranjit Singh
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. VS Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Notice issued to respondent not received back served or otherwise. However, counsel for the petitioners has stated that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous because the parties have effected compromise and resultantly, suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff, out of which this revision petition has arisen, has since been decreed by the trial court.
Accordingly, as prayed for by counsel for the petitioners, the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
( L.N. Mittal ) September 16, 2013 Judge 'dalbir'
Tiwana Dalbir Singh 2013.09.16 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. High Court, Chandigarh
Sarabjit Singh and another
Ranjit Singh
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
