The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant revision petition, stating the case had been compromised with the respondent bank. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
None; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2785 of 2012 Date of decision : September 27, 2013
Santosh Kumari
....Petitioner
versus
State Bank of India
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. Saqib Ali Khan, Advocate, for the petitioner
None for the respondent
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
instant revision petition stating that the case has been compromised with the respondent-Bank.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( L.N. Mittal ) September 27, 2013 Judge 'dalbir'
Tiwana Dalbir Singh 2013.09.27 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document. High Court, Chandigarh
Santosh Kumari
State Bank of India
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
