In a civil revision against the closure of plaintiff's evidence due to defendant's absence, the High Court dismissed the petition but granted liberty to the defendant to seek cross-examination from the trial court.
petitioner's revision dismissed; defendant granted liberty to approach trial court for cross-examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.232 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2013
Varun Goyal s/o Sh. G.P. Goyal # 2100, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh.
... Petitioner
Versus
M/s Allied Properties, SCO No.25, Sector 21, Chandigarh. Through its Partner Sh. Ashok Kumar Kukreja.
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate
for the petitioner.
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
15th January, 2013 Rajan
( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a civil revision may be maintained against the closure of a plaintiff's evidence in the absence of the defendant when no prior application for cross-examination was made.
Whether the defendant can approach the trial court subsequently for permission to cross-examine the plaintiff after the dismissal of the revision petition.
Varun Goyal
M/s Allied Properties
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
