Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a civil revision, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the revision with liberty to challenge lower court orders separately.
Permission to withdraw the civil revision granted; revision dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh revisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1713 of 2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : March 14, 2013
Dinesh Kumar Bansal
...Petitioner
Versus
M/s Aggarwal Feed Mill and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel appearing for the Revision petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Civil Revision.
Permission is granted. The Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Revisions separately challenging the three orders passed by the Courts below.
(M.JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
March 14, 2013 p.singh
Dinesh Kumar Bansal
M/s Aggarwal Feed Mill and another
M. JEYAPPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
