The High Court dismissed the civil revision filed by the petitioner seeking to set aside the trial court's order. This single-line order offered no merits and directed that two suits be decided together.
Order of the trial court dated 20.2.2013 dismissed; order for concurrent handling of two suits passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1695 of 2013
Date of decision: March 14, 2013
Suman Bansal
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Ruhani Satsang Prem Samaj Pinjore and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J
The petitioner has sought to set aside the order dated 20.2.2013 passed by the trial court.
Having examined the impugned order, the same does not suffer from any illegality much less irregularity or perversity warranting interference by this Court.
No merits.
Dismissed.
However, it is ordered that both the suits would be decided
together .
March 14, 2013 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Suman Bansal
Ruhani Satsang Prem Samaj Pinjore
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
