A petition was withdrawn with permission to pursue other remedies. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, noting the petitioner is not a party to the lis and cannot claim contempt proceedings.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to avail other independent remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP No. 3047 of 2013
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 3047 of 2013
Date of Decision: November 22, 2013
Mai Chand
…..Petitioner
Vs.
P.D. Verma
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr.Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Petitioner being not a party to any lis, cannot claim the launching of proceedings for contempt on account of violation of any order.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail any other independent remedy available to the petitioner.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 22, 2013 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
Gupta Sanjay 2013.11.25 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
COCP No. 3047 of 2013
[2]
Gupta Sanjay 2013.11.25 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Mai Chand
P.D. Verma
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
