The High Court declared the present COCP petition infructuous and dismissed it, resulting in the discharge of the rule.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********* **_COCP No.2099 of 2012 Date of Decision: 11.07.2013_ *******
Tilak Raj
. . . .Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Raj Kumar and another
. . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.P.S. Mann, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
Rule discharged.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 11.07.2013 JUDGE Vivek
Tilak Raj
Sh. Raj Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
