The High Court dismissed the contempt petition rendered infructuous without prejudice to the liability of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order.
The contempt petition was disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.10.26 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1888-2013 (O&M). Decided on: October 22, 2013.
Lakhu Raj @ Lehu
..... Petitioner
Versus
Suresh Dangi
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG., Haryana.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that direction dated 17.9.2012 to consider the legal notice dated 17.3.2012, has been complied with but the order Annexure R1 dated 27.12.2012 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 & 18 of the Constitution of India.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to challenge the order Annexure R1.
The present contempt petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the legality and propriety of order dated 27.12.2012, Annexure R1.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
October 22, 2013. JUDGE rka
Lakhu Raj @ Lehu
Suresh Dangi
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
