The appeal became infructuous due to a common decision passed in other liquidated appeals. The civil miscellaneous petition was allowed, and the incidental appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
CM No.5299 of 2012 allowed; LPA No.1687 of 2012 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CM No.5299 of 2012 and LPA No.1687 of 2012 Date of Decision: 10.12.2012
Poonam Sharma and others
...Appellants
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Addl.AG Punjab for respondents No.1 and 2.
Ms. Alka Chatarath, Advocate for respondent No.3.
A.K.SIKRI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellants does not press this appeal as he concedes that it has become infructuous in view of the common decision dated 31.10.2012 passed in LPA Nos.1046 and 1097 of 2012.
CM No.5299 of 2012 is allowed.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
( A.K.SIKRI ) CHIEF JUSTICE
( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) JUDGE
10.12.2012 Meenu
Poonam Sharma
The State of Punjab
A. K. Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
