This <320://1028></320> oral order allows an appeal by relying on a detailed judgment of the same court on the same date, without further elaboration.
This appeal is allowed as per the detailed judgment in FAO No.484 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.485 of 2011 (O&M) (in MACT Case No.66 of 2008) Date of decision: 12.1.2012
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
...Appellant
Versus
Anita and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Advocate for Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Mr.Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.3. ****
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
For detailed judgment, see judgment passed in FAO No.484 of
2011, titled as “Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamlesh Patel and others”, decided on even date, which shall be read as part of this order, this appeal has been allowed.
12.1.2012 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) gsv JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamlesh Patel and othersFollowed¶13
FAO No.484 of 2011
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Anita
Others
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
