The court held that no further order is required as the impugned order dated 17.05.2011 was complied with, and the appeal was already disposed.
No further order required as the order dated 17.05.2011 was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
F.A.O NO. 1734 OF 1992 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 08.02.2012
Union of India and another
...Appellants
versus
Mangal Singh
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Heman Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
The order dated 17.05.2011 is stated to have been complied with.
So, no further order is required to be passed as the appeal has already been disposed of.
Disposed of.
FEBRUARY 08, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Union of India
another
Mangal Singh
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
