Rakesh Sharma v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue any other remedy available under the law.
The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue any other remedy available under the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8202 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision : 03.05.2012
Rakesh Sharma
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner
MAHESH GROVER, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to pursue any other remedy available to him under the law.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
May 3, 2012 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge
Rakesh Sharma
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court