Petitioner-Company sought dismissal of a writ petition as infructuous due to the closure of the company against an award dated 01.02.2002.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.8141 of 2002
Date of Decision: October 09, 2012
Pfizer Limited
...... PETITIONER
Vs.
Presiding Officer and another
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Varun Sharma, Advocate for Mr.P.K.Mutneja, Advocate for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the fact that the petitioner-Company has been closed, the present writ petition has become infructuous, which has been filed against the award dated 01.02.2002 (Annexure P-12).
Dismissed as such.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
October 09, 2012 jt
Pfizer Limited
Presiding Officer
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
