For want of prosecution, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a writ petition where no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioner during arguments. No legal proposition is established as the matter was disposed of procedurally without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.6403 of 1994 Date of decision:07.05.2012
Ashok Kumar Sharma
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioner,
Ms.Aakanksha Sawhney, DAG, Haryana.
G .S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Copy of this order be sent to the petitioner.
07.05.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Ashok Kumar Sharma
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
