Petitioner challenged via writ petition. Court found the dispute settled during pendency. Writ petition declared infructuous and dismissed.
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.5303 of 2008 Date of decision:14.09.2012
Dharam Paul Mittal
...Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Jasbir Singh, ACJ.
Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of
this writ petition, the matter was taken up by the Settlement Commissioner and the dispute between the parties has been settled.
He further submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
( Jasbir Singh ) Acting Chief Justice
14.09.2012 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge
Dharam Paul Mittal
Union of India
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
