The court allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw the writ petition (C.M. No.4551 of 2012) and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal of writ petition allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No.4551 of 2012 and C.W.P. No.5010 of 2007
Date of Decision. 24.04.2012
Reshma Devi wife of late Shri Naseeb Singh, Peon, Sub Urban Sub Division, UHBVN, Narwana, District Jind
.......Petitioner
Versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through its Managing Director, Shakti Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula and others
.....Respondents
Present: Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
withdraw the writ petition through C.M. No.4551 of 2012.
as withdrawn.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
April 24, 2012 Pankaj*
Reshma Devi
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
