The Bench dismissed the writ petition, holding that the same criteria of admission already challenged and upheld in a previously disposed connected writ petition (CWP No.10154 of 1993) could not be re-litigated.
None. The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3396 of 1994 Date of decision:14.05.2012
Manphool Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
Maharishi Dayanand University & another
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Ankur Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner,
Mr.Vikrant Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
G .S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
reasons recorded in CWP No.10154 of 1993 titled Kumari Sanju etc. Vs.
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak etc.
14.05.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criteria of admission upheld in the earlier dismissed writ petition can be challenged in a separate filing over the same subject matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kumari Sanju etc. Vs. Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak etc.Relied on¶14
CWP No.10154 of 1993
Manphool Singh
Maharishi Dayanand University
another
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
