Writ petition seeking quashing of E-Tender notice dismissed for lack of documentary proof of prior allotment. Court stated future cases must be filed with relevant documents if evidence exists; order not res judicata. Petitioner represented by advocate.
Petition for quashing of E-Tender notice dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 24521 of 2011
Date of Decision: January 2, 2012
Subash Chand
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M. KUMAR, J.
CWP No. 24521 of 2011
2
possession of the petitioner then the petitioner may file a fresh petition by placing on record the relevant document on record and the instant order shall not operate as res judicata. Dismissed.
(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE
January 2, 2012 PKapoor
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to a quashing order when documentary evidence of tender allotment was absent.
Whether an allegation of prior tender allotment made in a writ petition without documentary proof can succeed.
Subash Chand
State of Punjab and others
M.M. KUMAR
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
