The petitioner sought a stay on the declaration of their account as a Non Performing Asset. The court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue available remedies.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the respondent-bank or avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 21824 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.11.2012
M/s. AD Global through its Proprietor Shree Bhagwan Jindal
....Petitioner
Vs.
Union Bank of India
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
November 02, 2012 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) Divyanshi JUDGE
M/s. AD Global
Union Bank of India
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G. S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
