The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous without providing substantive reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.20990 of 2008
Date of decision : 2.5.2012
Amarjit Singh Katari
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.A.K.Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 and 3.
Ms.Savita Tanwar, Advocate for Ms.Vandana Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.2.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
2.5.2012 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
Amarjit Singh Katari
The State of Punjab
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
