The High Court dismissed a writ petition as abandoned. During the hearing, the petitioner failed to appear, and no application to implead necessary parties as directed in 1997 was moved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 19054 of 1996
Date of Decision: 27.7.2012
Joginder Singh Bhogal
... Petitioner
Versus
U.T. Administration, Chandigarh and Others
... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain.
Present: None.
Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
On 14.3.1997, the following order was passed by this Court:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition be adjourned to enable him to implead the necessary parties.
Adjourned sine die. As and when necessary parties are impleaded, the office will put up the case for motion hearing.”
Thereafter, no application has been moved for bringing on
record necessary parties. Even today none is present.
Dismissed.
(Jasbir Singh) Acting Chief Justice
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
July 27, 2012 “DK”
Joginder Singh Bhogal
U.T. Administration, Chandigarh and Others
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
