The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Civil Writ Petition No. 16280 of 2009 as infructuous following an order passed on the same date in related Writ Petition No. 9858 of 2011.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 16280 of 2009
Date of Decision: 3.9.2012
Rattan Chand
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Others
... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain.
Present: Mr. Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3.
None for respondents No.4 and 5.
Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.6.
Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
In view of the order passed on even date in writ petition viz.
Civil Writ Petition No. 9858 of 2011, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such.
(Jasbir Singh) Acting Chief Justice
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
September 3, 2012 “DK”
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Writ Petition No. 9858 of 2011Referred¶15
Rattan Chand
State of Punjab
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
