pension which need not be deducted was later raised to 125/- and by notification dated 08.02.1983, the first 250/- as pension was to be discarded, while fixing the scale of pay. The petitioners' contention in the writ petition is that the Corporation omitted to notice that the amounts of pension, which was liable to be discarded for deduction, namely of 50/-, 125/- and 250/- on the various dates. The impugned notice issued in the year 1992 refers to the fact that as per the provisions contained in Articles 510 and 526 of CSR the pay on re-employment plus the ignorable amount of the pensionary benefits drawn by him from the different departments could not be more than what was last drawn at the time of discharge from defence or 3500/- whichever is less. I have extracted the Article 526 above and I do not find any provision that provides for the ceiling in the manner stated in the impugned order on 09.09.1992 (Annexure P-4). The impugned order also makes reference to the fact that the 1st petitioner Gurdas Singh was last drawing a pay of 250/before discharge from the Army and was allowed a pensionary benefit of 109/- of which a sum of 50/- was exempted. The order reads that to bring the petitioner at par with the salary, which he was drawing in the military at the time of discharge his salary was liable to be reduced to 191/- so that if the amount of pension in excess of 50/-, namely, an amount of 109/- was added, it would result in a parity of the salary, which he was drawing from the military service. The salary of every other petitioner has also been reduced on similar consideration. I do not find that the Corporation has taken notice of the modified circulars, which were issued in the year 1978 and 08.02.1983 raising the exemption limit to 125/- and 250/- as referred to above. The impugned orders are, therefore defective, insofar as they have not taken notice
