D.S Jaglan v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging a minor punishment warning from 1983-84 that downgraded the ACR, the Court held that the petition is infructuous as the petitioner has served over 40 years and would have retired. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive if the dispute subsists.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in event the dispute still subsists.