Petitioners withdrew a writ petition citing the need to file additional documents, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.146 of 2012
Date of Decision : 04.01.2012
Amar Kaur and others
… Petitioners
Versus
Financial Commissioner and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Mr. Jatinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.
Paramjeet Singh, J.
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners states that some documents are required to be filed with this writ petition, as such he wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforestated.
( PARAMJEET SINGH) JUDGE
04.01.2012
vcgarg
Amar Kaur and others
Financial Commissioner and others
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
