In default of appearance by the petitioner, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a writ petition filed for quashing selection/appointment and seeking directions under Article 226.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14465 of 1994 Date of decision:16.05.2012
S.N.Sharma
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Ms. Aakanksha Sawhney, DAG, Haryana for the respondent No.1.
Mr. H.N.Mehtani, Advocate for respondent no.2.
G.S.Sandhawalia J, (oral).
Prayer in the petition is for quashing the selection/appointment of
respondents No.3 to 32 and for issuance of direction to reconsider the
matter in accordance with law.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
16.05.2012 Pka
(G.S.Sandhawalia) JUDGE
S.N. Sharma
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
