The bench allowed a public interest litigation concerning an absence of a demand notice, permitting the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities for appropriate action as per law.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw petition with liberty to make a representation to concerned authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 14429 of 2012 Date of decision : 31.7.2012
Prithvi Raj Yadav .......Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India through its Chief Secretary and others
......Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present:Mr. Prithvi Raj Yadav-petitioner in person
Jasbir Singh, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
On perusal of the record it is revealed that notice of demand has not been issued to the respondents-authorities concerned.
Under such circumstances, we allow the petitioner to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the concerned authorities who shall take appropriate action thereon as per law.
(Jasbir Singh) Acting Chief Justice
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
31.7.2012 Ashwani
Prithvi Raj Yadav
Union of India
Jasbir Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
