This order notes that the petitioner's prayers are now infructuous due to a post-filing development and is disposed accordingly without elaboration on the substance of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 14127 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.7.2012
Aruna
..Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and others
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. R. S. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N. S. Pawar, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the development, which has taken place after filing of the writ petition in this court, the prayer made therein has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
31.7.2012 mk
Aruna
State of Punjab and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
