Jai Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to the respondents convening a DPC meeting resulting in the petitioners' promotion. The court granted liberty to file a representation claiming backdated promotion and directed a decision within four months.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file a representation claiming promotion from an earlier date; decision directed within four months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M.No.5230 of 2011 and C.W.P.No.121 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 03.05.2012
Jai Kumar Sharma and others
....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present:Mr.J.S.Maanipur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in light of the subsequent promotion of the petitioners via the Departmental Promotion Committee.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jai Kumar Sharma and others
- respondent
State of Haryana and others
Coram
Augustine George Masih
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/121/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court