Allowed

Raghbir Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jan 2012CWP/11846/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition regarding partition proceedings. Parties agreed to exchange specific Khasra numbers, and the Court directed the Assistant Collector to amend the *Naksha* and instrument accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Assistant Collector to effect changes in Naksha Bey and amend the instrument of partition based on the agreed exchange of Khasra numbers.

Raghbir Singh and Anr. Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

CWP No.11846 of 2010 (O&M) -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP No.11846 of 2010(O&M)

¶4

Date of Decision: 06.01.2012

¶5

Raghbir Singh and another

¶6

… Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Punjab and others

¶9

…Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH

¶11

Present: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

Mr. Bhagwant Gupta, Sr. DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 and 2.

¶13

Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate

¶14

for respondents No.3 and 4.

¶15

Paramjeet Singh, J.(Oral)

¶16

C.M. No.15159 of 2011

¶17

Application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶18

Affidavit of Gurnam Singh-petitioner is taken on record.

¶19

CWP No.11846 of 2010

¶20

The instant writ petition has been filed for setting aside order dated 29.11.2007 (Annexure P-2) passed by D.R.O-cum-Asstt. Collector Ist Grade, Nawanshahar, order dated 29.09.2008 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nawanshahar, order dated 19.11.2009 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Asstt. Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar and order dated 31.03.2010 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Financial Commissioner (AH), Punjab in the partition proceedings.

¶21

CWP No.11846 of 2010 (O&M) -2-

¶22

Learned counsel for the parties state that only dispute is with regard to Khasra No.35//21/1/1 measuring 4 marlas. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 has made a specific offer that they are ready to leave this number to the extent of 4 Marlas, if the petitioner is ready to give equivalent land from Khasra No.34//23/2/2, adjoining to the takk of respondents No.3 and 4. This offer is acceptable to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that petitioners have no dispute with other private respondents.

¶23

In view of the affidavit of petitioners placed on record and statement of the learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4, parties are directed to exchange the khasra numbers accordingly.

¶24

The present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Asstt. Collector Ist Grade to effect changes in Naksha ‘Bey’ accordingly and also amend Naksha Jeem and instrument of partition in view of the affidavit of petitioners and statement of learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4.

¶25

( PARAMJEET SINGH) JUDGE

¶26

06.01.2012

¶27

vcgarg

Raghbir Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghbir Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudarshan Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.(Allowed on 5.1.2012)

Rakesh Bhargava & Anr. Vs Satpal Jindal

Sawinder Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Sarabjit Singh Paras Vs State of Punjab

Jagtar Singh & Ors. Vs Div. Commissioner, Patiala & Ors.

Girdhari Lal Vs State of Punjab and Ors.