The petition was not prosecuted as neither party appeared before the court on two subsequent hearing dates.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11078 of 1992 (O & M) Date of Decision: January 05, 2012.
M/s Ultra Chemical Industries, Charkhi Dadri through its Proprietor Sh. Anand Kumar.
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana through its Secretary to the Government and another.
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
M.M. KUMAR, J.
The case was called yesterday also but no body had
appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
The matter has been called twice today. Again, no body
has put in appearance in support of the petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(M.M. KUMAR)
JUDGE
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
January 05, 2012 sukhpreet
M/s Ultra Chemical Industries, Charkhi Dadri through its Proprietor Sh. Anand Kumar
State of Haryana through its Secretary to the Government and another
M.M. KUMAR
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
