This court disposed of a civil revision by referring to reasons already recorded in a separate order of the same date regarding similar petitioners. No substantive reasoning was recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10378 of 2005 Date of decision:11.10.2012
Ajit Kumar Sharma
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S.Sidhu, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. *****
A.K.Sikri, CJ. (Oral)
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed in CWP No.18947 of 2005 titled as “Kuldeep Chopra and
others Vs. State of Punjab and others” of even date.
(A.K.Sikri)
Chief Justice
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
11.10.2012 vinod*
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kuldeep Chopra and others Vs. State of Punjab and othersReferred¶12
CWP No.18947 of 2005
Ajit Kumar Sharma
The State of Punjab
A.K.Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
