Petitioners abandoned the filing of a civil revision application in view of a compromise between parties; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRR No.2625 of 2004 Date of decision: 9.11.2012
Vinod and another
......Petitioners
Versus
Jaibir and others
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr.S.K.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does
not press this petition in view of the compromise effected between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
. (SABINA) JUDGE
November 9, 2012
anita
Vinod and another
Jaibir and others
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
