Harpreet Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court confirmed the anticipatory bail order dated 07.11.2012 for Harpreet Singh and another, noting that the petitioners had already joined the investigation and were not required for custodial interrogation, thereby upholding the discharge of conditions and release on bail.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 07.11.2012 granting anticipatory bail confirmed; petitioners directed to abide by conditions upon arrest.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Criminal Misc. M-35081 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7.12.2012.
Harpreet Singh and another
….Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH
Present: Mr. Bhavyadeep Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. B.S. Saini, Advocate for the complainant.
NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)
This is an application for anticipatory bail in case bearing First Information Report No.121 dated October 10, 2012 under Sections 406 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Bassi Pathana, District Fatehgarh Sahib.
On November 07, 2012, this Court passed the following
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail order dated 07.11.2012 should be confirmed in view of petitioners joining investigation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harpreet Singh
- petitioner
another
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/35081/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court