The petitioner sought to vary bail conditions or appearance before trial court finding the petition infructuous as bail bonds were accepted. Petition dismissed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to acceptance of bail bonds by trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M- 32189 of 2011(O & M) Date of decision:-10.1.2012
Shri Gugan Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Sushil Jaiswal
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. Vijay K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
RITU BAHRI J.(Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner contends that he was granted
permission to appear before the trial Court and submit his bail bonds.
Now, he has appeared before the trial Court and his bail
bonds have been accepted by the trial Court, hence, the present petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
January 10, 2012 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Shri Gugan Singh
Sushil Jaiswal
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
