In this order, Justice Ritu Bahri allowed the petitioner's challenge against an impugned order dated 15.09.2012 which proceeded the trial ex-parte and issued a conditional arrest warrant. The petition was allowed and the impugned order was quashed.
Petition allowed; order dated 15.09.2012 quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: November 21, 2012 CRR No. 3199 of 2012 (O&M)
Ashutosh Gaur
…petitioner
Versus
Smt. Pooja Gaur and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. B.R. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has challenged order dated 15.09.2012
whereby the trial proceeded ex-parte and issued conditional arrest of warrant.
The petitioner is present in the Court and states that he shall
appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing fixed by the trial Court.
The petition is allowed and order dated 15.09.2012 is hereby
quashed.
(RITU BAHRI)
JUDGE November 21, 2012 Atul
Ashutosh Gaur
Smt. Pooja Gaur
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
