In this bail matter, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petitioner's application, noting the earlier bail application was dismissed on merits and declining to assess evidence quality at this stage.
The bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.31879 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 12, 2012
Jasvir Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.R.S.Rangpuri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The earlier bail application of the petitioner was dismissed on merits in May, 2012. The recovery is of smack. The plea is that it is falsely foisted. This would have to be determined by the trial court. It will not be appropriate to express any view at this stage on the nature or quality of evidence.
Dismissed.
October 12, 2012 ramesh
( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim bail should be granted pending the trial on the plea of false impugnation.
Jasvir Kaur
State of Punjab
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
