The High Court of Punjab and Haryana admitted a writ petition but dismissed it as withdrawn by the petitioner without any substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-31262 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.11.2012
Rajinder Kaur Marwah
.....Petitioner
Vs.
U.T., Chandigarh and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present:Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Asima Mor, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be
permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 16, 2012 ( SABINA ) renu JUDGE
Rajinder Kaur Marwah
U.T., Chandigarh
Another
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
