Lala & Anr. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed pre-arrest bail for Petitioner No.1. Confirmed interim order requiring appearance before the trial court. Dismissed Petitioner No.2's petition for anticipatory bail as not maintainable due to lack of application under s. 438 Cr.P.C filed before the Sessions Court.
What did the court decide?
Petition of Petitioner No.1 allowed; interim order confirmed. Petition of Petitioner No.2 dismissed.