Satish Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at…
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-M No. 29711 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2012
Satish Kumar Yadav
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana
SABINA, J.
Even on the second call, none has appeared on behalf of
the petitioner. On the last couple of dates, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SABINA) JUDGE
November 23, 2012
anita
Satish Kumar Yadav
State of Haryana
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court