Shashi Kant Prasad v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-28895 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:. 5.11.2012
Shashi Kant Parshad
... Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG Haryana.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Manghal Sen, submits that the petitioner has already been granted bail by the Addl. Sessions Judge under the provisions of section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Probably, this is the reason that none is appearing for the petitioner.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
November 05,2012 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Shashi Kant Parshad
State of Haryana
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court