Allowed

Anuradha and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Aug 2012CRM-M/26600/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition wherein the petitioner sought protection of life and liberty from respondents 4-6. The court allowed the application by directing the Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, to take appropriate legal action on an application already filed by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

direction to respondent no.2, Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 28.8.2012 filed by the petitioners

Anuradha and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

Crl.M.No.M-26600 of 2012(O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl.M.No.M-26600 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: August 30, 2012

Anuradha and another

.....Petitioners

State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

¶11

Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.Rohiteswar Singh, Advocate.

¶12

......

¶13

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

Crl.M.No.51109 of 2012

¶15

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

Crl.M.No.M-26600 of 2012

¶17

The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondents no.2 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents no.4 to 6.

¶18

Heard.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 28.8.2012, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners.

¶20

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Year of birth of petitioner no.1-Anuradha, as per copy of Unique Identification Certificate, Annexure P1, is 1989, and year of birth of

¶21

-2-

¶22

Crl.M.No.M-26600 of 2012(O&M)

¶23

petitioner No.2- Ranjit Singh, as per copy of Unique Identification Certificate, Annexure P2, is 1987. They got married on 28.8.2012, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4.

¶24

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 28.8.2012, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.

¶25

(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge

¶26

30.8.2012 meenu

Anuradha and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuradha and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagjit Singh and Anr. Vs Indian Overseas Bank and Ors.

Major Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S Madhubani Exports Vs Labour Officer Gurgaon & Ors.

Jatinder Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Surinder Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Managing Committee of Sdspm College Vs Anju Chawla and Anr.